Look, I’ve been doing this for a while. Over the past 6 years of tracking every invoice in our mining equipment procurement system, I’ve managed a budget that hovers around $1.2 million annually. That covers everything from the Metso jaw crusher liners to the slurry pump rebuild kits. And in Q2 2024, I had to make a call that I’ve seen a lot of operations struggle with: do we automate the cone crusher with the Metso IC70C system, or stick with our manual setup?
We were adding a new secondary crushing line for our aggregates division. The choice came down to two configurations on paper: a Metso MX cone with the IC70C automation package, versus a standard Metso GP cone with a manual control panel. Same crusher footprint. Different brain power. And a budget difference that made my CFO nervous.
Here’s the thing: the price tag for automation is visible. It’s in the quote. What’s harder to see is the cost of not having it. My job is to calculate the total cost of ownership, not just the first invoice. So I built out a comparison across three dimensions that I think matter most for any operation considering this upgrade: operator dependency, installation & tuning integration, and long-term maintenance TCO.
Honestly, I went into this thinking the manual option was the safe bet. I was wrong about that. Here’s why.
This was the first surprise. I assumed ‘manual’ meant simpler and more reliable. No screens to crash, no software to update. Just a person turning a dial.
Manual Setup:
You need a skilled crusher operator. Not just any guy. Someone who can hear a chamber overload coming, adjust the CSS on the fly, and knows how to react when a feed surge hits. These people exist, but they’re expensive and hard to find. In our plant, losing one experienced operator set us back about $1,200 in rework and downtime while the new guy figured it out. Over a year, that adds up. I calculated that our manual operation cost roughly $8,400 annually in extra labor and downtime just from inconsistency.
Metso IC70C Setup:
The IC70C does what that operator does, but every cycle. It monitors power draw, hydrostatic pressure, and feed level. It automatically adjusts the crusher settings to maintain choke-fed conditions. Our MCP (Metal Crusher Protection) intervention alone saved us from a $4,500 rebuild cost when a tramp iron came through in a test run—the system backed off the main shaft instantly.
The data didn’t lie: the numbers said go with automation. My gut said, “But what if the system fails?” Something felt off about my worry, though. Turns out that was a fear of the unknown, not a real risk. The IC70C has a manual backup mode anyway. You can’t break what’s already backed up.
Verdict: Automation wins if you can’t guarantee a top-tier operator every shift. Period.
Here’s where the ‘cheap’ option starts to cost more than you think.
Manual Setup:
Simpler to install, yes. No extra wiring for PLCs, no network configuration. But here’s the assumption I made: ‘simpler’ equals ‘cheaper.’ I assumed the installation cost would be lower because there was less gear. I didn’t verify that with our maintenance team.
Turned out the manual system required more frequent calibration. The operator needed to check the gap setting daily. If the liner wore down unevenly, product quality dropped, and we had to re-screen. The cost of that re-screening? About $2,100 a year in wasted power and screen wear.
Metso IC70C Setup:
Installation took longer by about 3 days. We had to run cables, configure the touchscreen, and calibrate the sensors. That cost us about $1,800 in contractor labor. But after that, calibration was automated. The system tracks liner wear and adjusts parameters. We also got the IC70C’s data logging—which I didn’t think we needed. Now it’s the first thing our maintenance planner checks every morning.
Verdict: The IC70C costs more upfront to install, but it eliminates ongoing adjustment costs. Net win for automation in year one.
This is where I found the clearest difference. Saving $10k on the quote cost me $18k over 3 years. Let me explain.
Manual Setup TCO (3 years):
IC70C Setup TCO (3 years):
That’s a ~$19k savings over 3 years. Not a massive number for a big mine, but for a mid-sized aggregates company like ours, it’s real money. And that’s without accounting for the safety benefit—less time near the crusher for adjustments.
Verdict: The TCO comparison is clear. Automation pays for itself before the warranty runs out.
I want to address something here. A lot of these automation packages are marketed to massive operations. When I started out, buying spare parts for our single-ball mill circuit, vendors didn’t take my $200 orders seriously. But the ones who did? They’re the partners I stuck with. Small doesn’t mean unimportant—it means potential.
If you’re running a small quarry or a single crushing line, don’t assume automation is out of reach. The Metso IC70C scales down fine. In fact, for a smaller crew, it’s more valuable because you don’t have the bench strength of a dedicated control room. The system becomes your most consistent operator.
Looking back, I should have budgeted for automation from the start. At the time, my instinct was to minimize upfront cash. But given what I know now about the cost of manual management, that choice was the wrong one. We went with the IC70C. The only regret is not doing it sooner.
“The numbers said go with automation. My gut said stick with manual. I went with the data. No regrets.” — My notes from Q2 2024
So, when should you pick each option?
Choose the manual setup if:
- You have a single, experienced operator who’s been running the same crusher for 10 years.
- Your operation is very small and simple (one crusher, one product).
- Your budget is truly zero—you can’t afford the extra $18k.
- You plan to replace the crusher in 2 years anyway.
Choose the Metso IC70C if:
- You struggle with consistent operator skill.
- You want to reduce downtime risk (tramp iron protection).
- You value data for planning (wear tracking, power consumption logs).
- You plan to keep the crusher for 3+ years.
Bottom line: the IC70C isn’t just a gadget. It’s a cost control mechanism. And for a procurement guy like me, that’s the whole point. Done.
Our application engineers answer crusher and screen selection questions at no charge.
Ask an Expert