In my first year handling Metso IC automation cone crusher orders for a mid-sized aggregates operation, I made a mistake that cost us roughly $3,200 in rework plus a 1-week production delay. The worst part? It happened because I trusted the numbers on the screen more than what was actually coming out of the machine.
If you've ever stood next to a Metso LT106 jaw crusher thinking, "The dashboard says we're at 95% efficiency, so everything's fine," you know the feeling. The IC700i controller is a beautiful piece of tech. Bright screen, clear readouts, all the data you could want. But here's what nobody told me: the data is only as good as the settings you put in.
Everyone talks about the Metso IC automation cone crusher like it's set-and-forget magic. You punch in some parameters, hit start, and walk away. That's what I believed too.
But then the consistent problem showed up. On a Tuesday morning in Q3 2022, we ran a 200-tonne batch of feed through our HP300 cone with an IC70C controller. The screen showed stable power draw, consistent CSS, and healthy lubrication. By Thursday, the quality control report came back. We had 17% more fines than spec allowed. The cone was crushing too much, and the automation hadn't adjusted.
The common response is to blame the machine. "The Metso IC automation cone crusher isn't aggressive enough with adjustments." Or "The IC70C doesn't react fast enough to changes in feed." But after arguing about it in five different meetings, I realized the problem wasn't the automation. It was how we were using it.
Everything I'd read about Metso IC automation cone crushers said to input your target CSS, set your power limit, and let the system handle the rest. In practice, I found that most people—myself included—were treating the IC70C like a dumb control panel with a better interface.
Here's the part that got me. The IC70C has advanced features, like ASRi (Automatic Setting Regulation) and continuous liner wear compensation. But the default settings out of the box aren't optimized for every application. We ran it with factory defaults for six months. The machine worked, sure. But it wasn't working right.
The conventional wisdom is that automation compensates for operator inexperience. My experience with 200+ hours of monitoring suggested that automation amplifies operator decisions. If your base settings are wrong, the automation just makes the wrong thing happen faster and more consistently.
I've documented 7 significant mistakes in my three years working with Metso IC automation cone crushers and Metso LT106 jaw crushers. The total cost in wasted liners, rejected product, and downtime added up to roughly $14,500. That's real money for a mid-size operation.
The tangible costs were bad enough:
But the hidden costs were worse:
I lost credibility with the operations team. When I said "The IC70C says we're fine," they started checking the discharge belt themselves. When I said "I've got the automation dialed in," they laughed and pointed to the pile of reject material.
The numbers said go with the IC70C's recommended settings—after all, Metso builds the machines. My gut said something was off about the feed gradation we were giving it. I ignored my gut. Turns out the IC70C was compensating for an irregular feed that should have been fixed upstream. The cone was trying to fix a problem the screen deck should have handled.
I'm not gonna tell you the answer is buying more expensive equipment or hiring a consultant. That's what everyone says. Here's what worked for us:
We stopped treating the Metso IC automation cone crusher like a black box. We did a full audit of our setup parameters for the IC70C. Took a day of testing and observation on the HP300. We found that the factory CSS limit was too tight for our feed material. Loosened it by 3mm, and the product quality stabilized immediately.
I recommend the IC70C for operations that:
But if you're dealing with a variable feed that changes every few hours, the IC70C will fight itself. It'll try to maintain a consistent CSS, but the power draw will fluctuate wildly. You might be better off with a simpler system and a good operator for that specific case.
There's something satisfying about watching a properly tuned Metso IC automation cone crusher run steady for eight hours. After all the stress and the mistakes, seeing that consistent discharge gradation on the analyzer screen—that's the payoff.
Take it from someone who wasted $14,500 learning the hard way: the automation is the tool, not the solution. The solution is understanding your material, your machine, and not being afraid to override a setting when your experience tells you something is off. The IC70C can't taste the rock. You can.
Our application engineers answer crusher and screen selection questions at no charge.
Ask an Expert